The Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions (LASCBA) administers the Louisiana Bar Exam. Unlike most states, Louisiana has not adopted the Uniform Bar Examination (UBE®) and instead follows a state-specific structure. The exam consists of 9 subject exams and the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE®).
Louisiana has not announced plans to administer the NextGen bar exam.
Louisiana Bar Exam Structure
The Louisiana Bar Exam is 3 days long, with a 9-subject written exam.
| Morning (8 am -10 am) |
Midday (10:30 am - 12:30 pm) |
Afternoon (2 pm - 5 pm) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Monday | Civil Code I | Civil Code II | Civil Code III |
| Wednesday | LA Code of Civil Procedure | Torts | Business Entities |
| Friday | Constitutional Law | Criminal Law, Procedure & Evidence | Federal Jurisdiction & Procedure |
Louisiana Bar Exam Subjects and Topics
The Louisiana Bar Exam evaluates your knowledge of the Louisiana Civil Code, federal law, and practical legal skills through the following components:
Code Essay Subjects
The Code Essay portion of the Louisiana Bar Exam focuses on Louisiana’s unique civil code and legal traditions, which are distinct from common law jurisdictions. These subjects test an applicant’s ability to apply codified legal principles to complex fact patterns.
| Civil Code | Subjects |
|---|---|
| Civil Code I | Persons and family law |
| Civil Code II | Interstate distribution |
| Civil Code III | Code and related ancillaries |
| Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure | Any part of the Code of Civil Procedure |
| Torts | Areas of questions on civil code articles |
Non-Code Essay Subjects
The Non-Code Essay section evaluates an applicant’s understanding of laws outside Louisiana’s civil code, including constitutional, criminal, and corporate law. These subjects test an applicant’s ability to apply statutory and case law principles to practical legal scenarios.
| Business Entities and Negotiable Instruments | Provisions of the Louisiana Revised Statutes and the Louisiana Civil Code in relation to business entities |
| Constitutional Law | Constitutional areas that are commonly encountered over the course of one's legal career in Louisiana |
| Criminal Law, Procedure, and Evidence | Questioning on substantive criminal law and procedure |
| Federal Jurisdiction and Procedure | Jurisdiction of federal courts, the federal judicial system, and the law governing proceedings in such courts |
UWorld MBE Sample Questions
Louisiana is one of only 2 jurisdictions that have not adopted the MBE, but it still includes multiple-choice questions similar in format. While we don't offer Louisiana-specific questions, here are some MBE sample questions to help you practice.
A husband and wife were married in State A and lived there for 10 years before separating. One month later, the wife permanently moved to State B and immediately filed for divorce in a federal court in State B. The wife claims that she is entitled to $300,000 in alimony. The husband appeared in the action and has filed a motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
Should the court grant the motion?
- No, because the court has diversity jurisdiction over the case.
- No, because the husband waived a subject-matter jurisdiction challenge by appearing in the case.
- Yes, because state courts have exclusive jurisdiction over this type of action.
- Yes, because the wife did not establish a domicile in State B.
Explanation:
| Federal diversity jurisdiction exceptions |
|
Federal courts cannot exercise diversity jurisdiction over cases involving:
|
A federal court must possess subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the merits of a case before it. Subject-matter jurisdiction can be established through either:
- federal-question jurisdiction – when a claim arises under the U.S. Constitution, a treaty, or federal law (not seen here) or
- diversity jurisdiction – when the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and the opposing parties are citizens of different states.
Here, diversity jurisdiction is established since the wife claims that she is entitled to $300,000 and the parties are citizens of different states (States A and B). However, federal courts cannot exercise diversity jurisdiction over cases involving probate matters or domestic relations. Instead, state courts have exclusive jurisdiction over these types of actions (Choice A).* Therefore, the husband's motion to dismiss should be granted.
(Choice B) A challenge to subject-matter jurisdiction is never waived. However, a challenge to personal jurisdiction is waived if the defendant has voluntarily appeared in the case, unless it was a special appearance for the express purpose of objecting to personal jurisdiction.
(Choice D) An individual is a citizen of the state where he/she is domiciled—ie, physically present with the intent to remain indefinitely. Since the wife permanently moved to State B, she has established her domicile there.
Educational objective:
Federal courts cannot exercise diversity
jurisdiction over cases involving probate matters or domestic relations. Instead, state courts
have exclusive jurisdiction over these types of cases.
Bluebook Citations :
- Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 U.S. 689, 703–04 (1992) (explaining the domestic-relations exception to diversity jurisdiction).
A congressional committee investigated the pharmaceutical industry and found that the high cost of prescription drugs purchased and sold in the United States negatively impacted the nation's economy and the health of its citizens. In response, Congress passed a statute that regulates "the retail prices of every purchase or sale of prescription drugs in the United States."
A group of pharmaceutical companies challenged the constitutionality of this statute in federal court.
What is the strongest argument in support of the constitutionality of this statute?
- Congress may enact statutes for the general welfare.
- Congress may regulate the prices of all domestic purchases and sales of goods.
- The Constitution grants Congress the power to regulate the interstate transportation of prescription drugs.
- The purchases and sales of prescription drugs in the United States substantially impact interstate commerce in the aggregate.
Explanation:
The commerce clause gives Congress broad power to regulate interstate and foreign commerce. This includes:
- the channels of interstate and foreign commerce (eg, roadways)
- the instrumentalities of interstate and foreign commerce (eg, vehicles)
- persons and things moving in interstate or foreign commerce (eg, goods and services) and
- in-state activities that, singly or in the aggregate, substantially impact interstate or foreign commerce.
Since Congress's commerce power is broad, federal statutes are constitutional if there is any rational basis for concluding that the regulated activity substantially affects interstate or foreign commerce. This can be shown through express congressional findings.
Here, the federal statute regulates the retail prices of prescription drugs in the United States. Congress has the authority to regulate such products' interstate transportation, but this statute also regulates in-state purchases and sales (Choice C). Since the congressional committee found that the high cost of prescription drugs negatively impacted the nation's economy, it is rational to conclude that their aggregated in-state purchases and sales substantially impact interstate commerce. Therefore, this is the strongest argument to support this statute.
(Choice A) The taxing and spending clause empowers Congress to tax and spend for the general welfare. But regulating prices is not equivalent to taxing or spending.
(Choice B) Congress cannot regulate the prices of every domestic purchase and sale of goods since it cannot regulate purely in-state sales that do not substantially affect interstate commerce.
Educational objective:
The commerce clause empowers Congress to regulate (1)
channels and instrumentalities of, (2) persons and things moving in, and (3) in-state activities
that—singly or in the aggregate—substantially affect interstate or foreign commerce.
Bluebook Citations :
- Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 17 (2005) (explaining Congress's broad authority under the commerce clause).
The owner of a new office building contracted with a well-known landscaper to design and install landscaping around the building for $30,000. The agreement was memorialized in writing, was signed by both parties, and called for a budget of $5,000 for trees, shrubs, sod, and materials. The contract required the landscaper to complete the work within six months. Due to an unexpected increase in the price of trees and shrubs, the landscaper abandoned the project and never completed any of the work.
Three years after the landscaper's deadline, the building owner sued the landscaper for breach of contract. In the jurisdiction, the statute of limitations for breach of a services contract is two years after the breach, and the statute of limitations for breach of a sale-of-goods contract is four years.
Can the owner recover damages from the landscaper?
- No, because the contract is divisible with respect to the services and goods, and the landscaper's breach is therefore subject to the two-year statute of limitations.
- No, because the contract primarily calls for services, and the landscaper's breach is therefore subject to the two-year statute of limitations.
- Yes, because the landscaper's breach was a result of an increase in the price of goods, and his breach is therefore subject to the four-year statute of limitations.
- Yes, because the landscaper's breach was willful, and he is therefore estopped from denying that his breach is subject to the four-year statute of limitations.
Contracts for the sale of goods are governed by Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), while contracts for services are governed by common law. However, some contracts involve the sale of goods and the rendering of services. To determine which law applies to a "mixed" or "hybrid" contract, courts ask whether its predominant purpose was the sale of goods or the rendering of services. The following factors are relevant to this determination:
- The contract's language
- The nature of the supplier's business (ie, whether it typically provides goods or services)
- The relative value of the goods and services
- The nature of the final product (ie, whether it can be described as a good or service)
Here, the building owner contracted to buy goods (eg, trees, shrubs, sod) and services (ie, designing and installing the landscaping). The owner likely hired the well-known landscaper due to his skill in performing landscaping services, and the $5,000 budget for goods was just one-sixth of the $30,000 contract price. Therefore, the contract primarily calls for services and is subject to the jurisdiction's two-year statute of limitations. And since the owner sued three years after the breach, the owner cannot recover damages from the landscaper.
(Choice A) The predominant-purpose test is unnecessary when a contract is divisible—ie, when the payment for goods can easily be separated from the payment for services. But here, the contract is likely indivisible since it combined the sale of the trees, shrubs, and sod with their installation.
(Choices C & D) The predominant-purpose test focuses on the parties' reason for entering the contract—not for breaching it. Therefore, it is irrelevant that the landscaper's breach was (1) a result of an increase in the price of goods or (2) willful.
Educational objective:
Sale-of-goods contracts are governed by the UCC,
while services contracts are governed by common law. When a contract calls for the sale of goods
AND the rendering of services, the contract's primary purpose determines whether the UCC or
common law applies.
Bluebook Citations :
- Bonebrake v. Cox, 499 F.2d 951, 960 (8th Cir. 1974) (applying the predominant-purpose test to determine which statute of limitations applies to a mixed contract for goods and services).
- Princess Cruises, Inc. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 143 F.3d 828, 833 (4th Cir. 1998) (listing factors that courts consider when applying the predominant-purpose test).
A man and a woman dated for several weeks. During that time, the man repeatedly asked the woman to have sex. Each time, the woman responded that she would not have sex with the man unless they were married. One evening, the man promised the woman that they would elope the following weekend if she would agree to have sex. The woman agreed and the couple had sex. The following weekend, the man told the woman that he had no intention of eloping and only made that promise to get the woman's consent. The woman reported the man to the police, who later arrested and charged the man with rape.
Is the man guilty of rape?
- No, because fraud in factum did not negate the woman's consent.
- No, because fraud in the inducement did not negate the woman's consent.
- Yes, because the woman's consent was obtained by fraud in factum.
- Yes, because the woman's consent was obtained by fraud in the inducement.
Explanation:
| Consent to sexual intercourse obtained by fraud | ||
| Type of fraud | Definition | Effect |
| In factum |
|
Negates victim's consent |
| In inducement |
|
Does not negate victim's consent |
In most modern jurisdictions, rape is defined as sexual intercourse with another without that person's consent.* This means that rape did not occur if the victim consented to sexual intercourse. However, a victim's consent may be ineffective if it was obtained by fraud. There are two types of fraud:
- Fraud in factum – when consent is obtained by fraud regarding the nature of the act itself, leaving the victim unaware that he/she consented to sexual intercourse and negating the victim's consent
- Fraud in the inducement – when consent is obtained by fraud regarding what the victim knows is an act of sexual intercourse, which does not negate the victim's consent
As a result, consent obtained by fraud in factum is not a valid defense to rape, but consent obtained by fraud in the inducement is a valid defense.
Here, the man falsely promised the woman that they would elope if she agreed to have sex with him. Since the woman knew that the act to which she consented was sexual intercourse, her consent was obtained by fraud in the inducement (Choices A & C). This type of fraud did not negate the woman's consent, so the man is not guilty of rape (Choice D).
Educational objective:
Fraud in factum occurs when the fraud pertains to the nature of the act itself and negates a rape victim's consent. In contrast, fraud in the inducement occurs when fraud is used to gain consent to what the victim knows is an act of sexual intercourse and does not negate the victim's consent.
A plaintiff sued a defendant for negligence to recover damages that the plaintiff suffered as a result of a crash between the two parties. At trial, the plaintiff's attorney called the plaintiff's wife to testify as to what she witnessed on the day of the crash. On cross-examination of the wife, the defendant's lawyer elicited several responses that tended to show that the plaintiff's actions constituted contributory negligence. The plaintiff's attorney seeks to ask the wife several questions on redirect examination, but the defendant's attorney objected.
What is the strongest argument that the court must allow redirect examination of the wife?
- The plaintiff's attorney failed to provide all significant information on direct examination.
- The plaintiff's attorney seeks to reiterate the necessary elements of the claim.
- The plaintiff's attorney seeks to reply to all matters raised on cross-examination.
- The plaintiff's attorney seeks to reply to significant new matters raised on cross-examination.
Explanation:
Federal Rule of Evidence 611 gives trial courts the authority to exercise reasonable control over the mode and order of examining witnesses at trial. This includes the discretion to determine whether—and to what extent—redirect examination of witnesses should be permitted. But when a party raises a significant new matter while cross-examining a witness, the court must allow the opposing party to address that matter through redirect examination.
Therefore, the strongest argument for allowing redirect examination of the plaintiff's wife is that the plaintiff's attorney seeks to reply to significant new matters that were raised on cross-examination.
(Choice A) A party is expected to elicit all significant information during direct examination of a witness. Therefore, a court need not permit redirect examination to allow the party to provide information inadvertently omitted on direct examination.
(Choices B & C) Redirect examination is generally limited to significant new matters raised on cross-examination. Therefore, a party is not entitled to redirect examination to (1) reiterate information like the necessary elements of the claim or (2) reply to all matters addressed in cross-examination.
Educational objective:
When a party raises a significant new matter on cross-examination of a witness, the court must allow redirect examination by the opposing party to address that matter.
Bluebook Citations :
- Fed. R. Evid. 611 (explaining the mode and order of examining witnesses).
Twenty years ago, a man who owned a 20-acre ranch agreed to sell all of his mineral rights to his neighbor. The man executed a warranty deed conveying the mineral estate to the neighbor, who failed to record the deed.
The following year, a woman moved her mobile home onto an undeveloped five-acre portion of the man's ranch. After the woman had lived on the property for 10 years, a local drilling company began operations on a nearby tract to drill a natural gas well. Believing that the woman owned the property, the drilling company approached the woman about leasing the mineral rights on her property and requested that the woman sign a lease of her mineral rights. The woman signed the lease as requested, and it was promptly and properly recorded. The drilling operations were successful, and the drilling company prepared to distribute profits from royalties. However, a dispute arose between the neighbor and the woman, as both parties claim ownership of the minerals.
The period of time to acquire title by adverse possession in the jurisdiction is 10 years.
In an action to determine title, is the court likely to award title to the mineral estate to the woman?
- No, because the woman actually possessed only the surface estate that had previously been severed from the mineral estate.
- No, because the woman did not actually possess the mineral estate until she signed the lease of the mineral rights.
- Yes, because the neighbor failed to record the warranty deed conveying the mineral estate.
- Yes, because the woman adversely possessed both the surface estate and the mineral estate for the statutory period.
Explanation:
An adverse possessor can acquire title to land owned by another if his/her possession of the land is:
- Open and notorious – apparent or visible to a reasonable owner
- Continuous – uninterrupted for the statutory period
- Exclusive – not shared with the owner
- Actual – physical presence on the land and
- Nonpermissive – hostile and adverse to the owner.
If the surface and mineral estates are owned by the same party, then the adverse possessor will acquire title to both estates—even if only one estate is actually possessed. But if the mineral estate has been severed from the surface estate (ie, the surface and mineral estates are owned by different parties), then the adverse possessor will only acquire title to the estate that is actually possessed. The mineral estate is actually possessed when the adverse possessor mines or drills wells on the land.
Here, the neighbor purchased the mineral estate from the man, thereby severing the mineral estate from the surface estate. And since the woman merely lived on the property for the 10-year statutory period—she did not attempt to mine or drill a well on the mineral estate—she actually possessed only the surface estate during that time (Choice D). This means that the woman did not adversely possess the mineral estate, and the court is not likely to award her title to that estate.
(Choice B) Adverse possession of a mineral estate requires the commencement of drilling or mining operations. Merely signing a lease of the mineral rights is not enough.
(Choice C) A deed need not be recorded to be valid, so the neighbor's failure to record has no impact on whether the woman adversely possessed the mineral estate.
Educational objective:
If a mineral estate has previously been severed from the surface estate (ie, surface and minerals owned by different persons), then an adverse possessor can only acquire title to the mineral estate by actually possessing the minerals (eg, by mining or drilling wells).
A teenager was riding a bicycle when she saw a classmate walking toward her. The teenager rode quickly toward the classmate, knowing that he would think she would run into him on her current trajectory. The teenager was not purposefully trying to harm or touch him. The classmate saw the teenager riding toward him and yelled at her to stop. The teenager swerved at the last moment and avoided hitting him. The classmate had a panic attack because he thought that the teenager would hit him.
Is the classmate likely to succeed if he sues the teenager for assault?
- No, because the teenager did not make contact with the classmate.
- No, because the teenager did not purposefully try to harm or touch the classmate.
- Yes, because the teenager acted with the requisite intent.
- Yes, because the teenager's conduct was extreme and outrageous.
Explanation:
Assault occurs when (1) a defendant intends to cause the plaintiff to anticipate an imminent, and harmful or offensive, contact with the plaintiff's person and (2) the defendant's affirmative conduct causes the plaintiff to anticipate such contact. The intent requirement is met when the defendant acts with either:
- purpose – the desire to cause anticipation of an imminent harmful or offensive contact or
- knowledge – the substantial certainty that the plaintiff will suffer such anticipation.
Here, the teenager rode her bicycle directly at her classmate, causing him to think that she would hit him (anticipation of imminent contact). And since the teenager knew with substantial certainty that the classmate would think she would run into him, she acted with the requisite intent. As a result, the classmate is likely to succeed in a suit against the teenager for assault.
(Choice A) Assault merely requires that the plaintiff be placed in anticipation of imminent contact. Actual bodily contact is not required. Therefore, the fact that the teenager did not make contact with the classmate is irrelevant.
(Choice B) The intent to make contact with the plaintiff is a requirement for battery, but assault merely requires the intent to cause the plaintiff to anticipate imminent contact. Therefore, the fact that the teenager did not purposefully try to harm or touch the classmate does not absolve her of liability for assault.
(Choice D) Extreme and outrageous conduct (i.e., conduct that is unacceptable in civilized society) is an element of intentional infliction of emotional distress—not assault, which only requires intentional conduct.
Educational objective:
For assault, intent exists when a defendant acts with the purpose (desire) or knowledge (substantial certainty) that his/her conduct will cause the plaintiff to anticipate an imminent, and harmful or offensive, contact.
- Restatement (Third) of Torts: Intentional Torts to Persons § 105 (Am. L. Inst., Tentative Draft No. 1, 2015) (providing the elements for assault).
Take a look at a typical competitor sample question below. Their practice questions might parody the exam, but ours consistently meet or exceed exam-level difficulty. Their limited explanations address the right answer choice but do not go the extra mile to explain the wrong choices – so you don’t make the same mistakes on exam day.
A mother gave her land to her two kids, a son, and a daughter, as joint tenants. The son built two adjoining homes on the land. He lived in one house and rented the other. The daughter lived out of the country and never visited the land. The daughter needed money, so she sold her interest in the land to her ex-boyfriend. Her ex-boyfriend immediately hired a developer to build a third home on the land. Soon after the daughter had sold her interest in the land, she was killed in a motorcycle accident. The ex-boyfriend is now asking the court for a judicial partition of the land. The son contends that upon his sister's death, he was now the sole owner of the land.
How should the court rule?
- For the ex-boyfriend, because he plans to live on the land.
- For the ex-boyfriend, because he paid for the son’s interest in the land.
- For the son, because he has the right of survivorship.
- For the son, because he has the sole position of the land.
Explanation:
Correct answer: B
Louisiana Bar Exam Requirements
To sit for the Louisiana Bar Exam, you must meet specific educational and certification requirements, depending on whether you're a law school student, a foreign-educated lawyer, or seeking admission without examination.
Law School Students
To be eligible for the Louisiana Bar Exam, you must have earned or be on track to earn a Juris Doctor (JD) or Bachelor of Laws (LL.B.) degree from a law school accredited by the American Bar Association (ABA).
Foreign Lawyers and Students
If you graduated from a foreign law school not accredited by the ABA, you may petition to take the Louisiana Bar Exam by demonstrating good cause. To qualify:
- You must have passed the bar examination in another state and be a member in good standing of that state’s bar.
- You must complete 14 semester hours at an ABA-accredited university in specific subjects, with no more than 6 hours obtained through distance learning. You must submit certified transcripts of your legal education (both foreign and U.S.).
- You must provide documentation describing the courses and requirements of the legal education programs you attended.You must supply information about the universities that provided your recent legal training.
- You must provide proof of admission, licensing, and/or good standing in all legal, professional, and/or bar associations.
- You must submit 2 original letters of recommendation from individuals licensed to practice in any jurisdiction where you are currently licensed.
All foreign documents must be translated into English by a certified translator. A bar exam application cannot be started until an equivalency determination has been made.
Admission on Motion (Reciprocity)
Louisiana does not offer admission on motion or reciprocity. All applicants must take the Louisiana Bar Exam.
Scheduling
To sit for the Louisiana Bar Exam, follow these steps:
- Create an Online Account: Register with the Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions (LASCBA) through their online portal.
- Complete the Bar Application: Fill out the Bar Examination Application and sign the Authorization and Release form. This includes submitting a character report application to the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE).
- Request a Dean's Certificate: LASCBA will send a request for a dean's certificate directly to your law school. Ensure this is completed at least 45 days before the exam.
- Submit a Recent Photograph: Provide a recent photo as part of your application.
- Undergo a Criminal Background Check: Complete fingerprinting and a state and federal criminal background check.
- Arrange for MPRE Scores: Ensure your Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) scores are sent to LASCBA.
- Request Testing Accommodations (if applicable): If you require special accommodations, submit the necessary forms by the application deadline.
- Review Application Checklist: Use the application with examination checklist to ensure all steps are completed.
Regularly check your LASCBA online portal for updates and communications throughout the application process.
Louisiana Bar Exam Deadlines, Fees, and Cost-Saving Options
Submit your Louisiana Bar Exam application early to give yourself time to gather all necessary documents and avoid late fees. See key deadlines, fees, and payment options below.
Exam Dates and Deadlines
| Filing Deadline | July 2025 | February 2026 | July 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Timely Deadline | Lapsed | Sep 1, 2025 - Nov 1, 2025 | TBA |
| Late Deadline | Feb 2, 2025 - May 15, 2025 | Nov 2, 2025 - Dec 15, 2025 | TBA |
| Reapplication Deadline | Dec 1, 2024 - May 15, 2025 | Sep 1, 2025 - Dec 15, 2025 | TBA |
Fees
| Application Fees | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| LA Law Students | $850 | ||
| First Time Apps | $975 | ||
| Re-Applicants | $975 | ||
| Foreign Educated | $975 | ||
| In-House Counsel | $975 | ||
| Other Application Fees | |||
| LA-Criminal Background Check | $39.25 | ||
| Fingerprinting | $10 | ||
| Equivalency Application (Foreign Educated) | $300 | ||
| Law School Registration (2nd year) | $150 | ||
| Character and Fitness (JB/LL.B awarded in over 1 year) | $275 | ||
| Character and Fitness (JB/LL.B awarded in under 1 year) | $395 | ||
| Character and Fitness (JB/LL.B awarded in under 1 year) | $550 | ||
| Character and Fitness (Law degree not obtained in U.S.) | $925 | ||
| Late Fees | |||
| Law Student Registration | $350 | ||
| Bar Exam App. | $875 | ||
Payment Policies
The board accepts money orders, cashier's checks, and credit card payments. Personal checks are not accepted. If you fail to appear for your examination, you can apply your fee to the next administration.
Cost-Saving Options
There are a number of scholarships and grants available to assist Louisiana law students and graduates with legal education and bar exam costs. Here are some resources that you can explore:
- Louisiana State University (LSU) Paul M. Hebert Law Center: Offers merit-based scholarships to incoming and current students, with awards ranging from $1,000 to full tuition. Admitted applicants are automatically considered for scholarship assistance.
- AccessLex Institute Law School Scholarship Databank: Features over 800 carefully curated and vetted scholarship opportunities and writing competitions, totaling more than $3 million in aid.
- Louisiana Office of Student Financial Assistance (LOSFA): Administers programs like the Taylor Opportunity Program for Students (TOPS), a state merit-based scholarship for Louisiana residents attending approved postsecondary institutions.
- Check out the ABA website, which offers 100+ opportunities and programs for young lawyers and law students.
Louisiana Bar Exam Scoring
The Louisiana Bar Exam is graded by anonymous members of the Louisiana Bar who are appointed by the Louisiana Supreme Court. Each of the 9 tests contained in the written exam is worth 100 raw points. Exams 1-5 (code exams) are worth twice the weight of exams 6-9 (non-code exams).
You must earn a total minimum weighted score of 650 out of 900 to pass. This does not mean that you can earn 65 out of 100 on each test and pass. Remember, code exams are double the weight, so your raw score on these subjects will comprise a higher percentage of your total score. Candidates must also pass the MPRE with a minimum score of 80.
Louisiana Bar Exam Results and Pass Rates
As is common with bar exams across the U.S., the Louisiana Bar Exam's pass rate for repeaters is considerably lower than for those taking it for the first time. This is likely because many repeat takers don't modify their study habits.
| Exam | Overall Pass Rate | First-Timer Pass Rate | Repeater Pass Rate | Results Release Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2024 | 66% | 75% | 16% | October 4 |
| Feb. 2024 | 49% | 61% | 42% | April 26 |
| Exam | First-Timers | Repeaters | Overall | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year | No. of Candidates | Pass Rate | No. of Candidates | Pass Rate | No. of Candidates | Pass Rate |
| 2024 | 523 | 68% | 204 | 29% | 727 | 58% |
| 2023 | 497 | 71% | 195 | 38% | 692 | 62% |
| 2022 | 273 | 73% | 110 | 31% | 383 | 60% |
| 2021 | 630 | 74% | 195 | 35% | 825 | 64% |
| 2020 | 201 | 60% | 283 | 52% | 484 | 55% |
| 2019 | 540 | 74% | 195 | 41% | 735 | 65% |
| 2018 | 592 | 75% | 198 | 40% | 790 | 66% |
| 2017 | 561 | 77% | 254 | 50% | 815 | 68% |
Additional Louisiana Bar Requirements
To obtain and maintain licensure in Louisiana, candidates must meet additional requirements beyond passing the bar exam.
MPRE Requirements
The MPRE is a 2-hour, 60-question multiple-choice exam assessing knowledge of professional conduct. You must pass with a score of 85 or higher within 28 months before the next scheduled exam. Registration is available through the NCBE.
Learn More
Character and Fitness Requirements
In Louisiana, the character and fitness review is conducted through the National Conference of Bar Examiners (NCBE) after you pass the bar exam, but it must be approved before you are admitted to the state bar. This review evaluates your integrity, judgment, and responsibility based on the detailed personal, academic, and professional history you disclose, requiring full transparency for approval.
Louisiana Board of Bar Examiners Contact Information
If you have any questions, you can contact the Louisiana Supreme Court Committee on Bar Admissions using the information below.
| Louisiana Board of Bar Examiners Contact Information | |
|---|---|
| Medium | Info |
| Phone Number | 504-830-5463 |
| Fax Number | 504-581-8598 |
| [email protected] | |
Address |
The Committee on Bar Admissions 2800 Veterans Memorial Blvd., Suite 340 Metairie, LA 70002 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Can anyone take the bar exam in Louisiana?
To take the bar exam in Louisiana, you must have a Juris Doctor (JD) from an ABA-accredited law school and be deemed of sound moral character and fit to practice law.
How long is the bar exam in Louisiana?
The bar exam in Louisiana is the longest bar exam in the U.S. It spans 3 days and contains 21 hours of testing time.
What are Louisiana Bar Exam application deadlines and fees?
The fee to apply for the Louisiana Bar Exam is $875. Applications must be submitted by May 15 and December 15 for the February and July exams, respectively.
How hard is the Louisiana Bar Exam?
The Louisiana Bar Exam is challenging due to its unique civil law system, lack of UBE adoption, and 3-day, 21-hour format, the longest in the U.S.
How long should I study for the Louisiana Bar Exam?
You should plan to study for at least 400 hours, ideally starting 8-10 weeks before the exam or earlier to improve retention and minimize stress.
What is the minimum passing score for Louisiana?
The minimum passing score for Louisiana is 650 out of 900.
How many times can I take the Louisiana Bar Exam?
Applicants can take the Louisiana Bar Exam only 5 times.
How much does it cost to retake the Louisiana Bar Exam?
It costs $975 to retake the Louisiana Bar Exam.
Does Louisiana offer reciprocity with any jurisdiction?
Louisiana does not offer reciprocity. You cannot be admitted to the Louisiana Bar without taking the LA Bar Exam.
What is the admission process for foreign candidates for the Louisiana Bar Exam?
Foreigners may sit for the LA Bar Exam if their legal education is commensurate with the standards set by the committee and they have taken 14 semester hours of ABA-approved courses.
How do I become a licensed attorney in Louisiana?
To become a licensed attorney in Louisiana, you must go to law school, pass the bar exam and the MPRE, and be deemed of good moral character and fit to practice law.
How to request special accommodations for the Louisiana Bar Exam?
To request special accommodations for the Louisiana Bar Exam, you must fill out the Applicant Request for Test Accommodations after receipt of all required information in your primary application.
References
- Louisiana Supreme Court Board of Admissions. (n.d.). Louisiana Supreme Court Board of Admissions. https://www.lascba.org/index.aspx
- National Conference of Bar Examiners. (n.d.). National Conference of Bar Examiners. https://ncbex.org/
