Contributory Negligence v. Comparative Negligence

contributory negligence vs comparative negligence
Contributory Negligence v. Comparative Negligence- learn the three rules of recovery for pure, modified, and contributory negligence to answer torts questions on the MBE exam!
Share this blog
contributory negligence vs comparative negligence
Quick Links

What happens if you prevail on a negligence claim but are found partially responsible for your harm? Cue the quintessential lawyer answer: it depends!

Most jurisdictions determine the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover by comparing the plaintiff’s fault to that of the defendant(s). This is called “comparative negligence,” which may be pure or modified to a middle-ground approach. Other jurisdictions take a harsher stance and hold that the plaintiff cannot recover any damages if the plaintiff contributed to his/her harm. This is called “contributory negligence.” These three rules of recovery are summarized below:

  • Pure comparative negligence (default rule on the MBE®) – recovery is reduced by the plaintiff’s percentage of fault
  • Modified comparative negligence – the same as pure comparative negligence, except that recovery is barred if the plaintiff’s fault exceeds 50%
  • Contributory negligence – recovery is barred if the plaintiff shares any percentage of the fault, no matter how small (even 1%)

Remember to always apply pure comparative negligence unless the facts tell you otherwise! Here’s a simple illustration that will help you remember these concepts:

negligence rules of recovery

You can use this tip when answering practice questions in the UWorld MBE® QBank.

Share this blog

View More...

Latest From the UWorld Legal Blog

Scroll to Top